Judge OKs Wording of Affirmative Action Ballot Measure
Related News
- 08/28/09 — Voters Could Decide 7 Ballot Initiatives In 2010
- 08/14/09 — Attempts Being Made to Eradicate Equal Opportunity In Missouri
- 08/05/09 — GOP sends 3 measures to 2010 ballot
- 06/28/09 — Ward Connerly watch: Ward Connerly’s anti equal opportunity initiative back on the ballot
- 06/26/09 — “Missouri Judge Strike Down Proposed Connerly Amendment
- More Equal Opportunity news
Omaha World Herald: A Lincoln judge ruled today that the wording of a state ballot measure seeking to ban most forms of affirmative action is mostly acceptable and can largely be used on Nebraska's November ballot. The ruling seemingly clears the way for the Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative to appear on the ballot in the language preferred by its supporters. Nebraskans United, the group opposed to the ban, had said the initiative's ballot language would confuse voters. For example, the group argues that the language misleadingly ties the ballot initiative to the civil rights movement, even though most civil rights leaders support affirmative action programs. Lancaster County District Judge Stephen Burns made no changes to the language of the "explanatory statement," ruling that his court has no jurisdiction over the statement meant to explain the initiative to voters.
To read more click here.
Comments
Excellent web-site. Nice posting comments system. I am sorry for the off-topic write-up, nevertheless I was incredibly fascinated with Djokovic’s play in the final of the Australian OPen this year. The man is probably unbeatable. He revealed he was as sturdy as stainlesss steel. Just think about he he can whip Nadal who had previously been so enthusiastic to win and really was so energized up while in the fifth set. I’m beginning to think that Djokovic has been doing some psychic work to take some forces on his side which help him win this kind of matches up against the greatest players in the planet
buy essay. Whatrrrs your opinion about Rafa’s game?
