Group Opposed CT Constitutional Convention
Related News
- 01/22/10 — Property group calls off initiative
- 01/15/10 — Push for Looser Marijuana Laws Gains Momentum
- 01/15/10 — Supreme Court to Rule on Right to Privacy for Referendum Petition Signers
- 01/10/10 — Vote on puppy mill act is sought
- 01/06/10 — Legislators push for openness in ballot initiatives
- More Other Issues news
Connecticut Post: The organization, called "Vote No: Protect Our Constitution," said such a convention would be "risky" because it could possibly be commandeered by a variety of special interests, including groups opposed to abortion, gay rights and funding public schools, or in support of initiative and referendum. Members of the group included unionized teachers, the Connecticut Education Association, Connecticut AFL-CIO, the Connecticut National Organization for Women, gay and lesbian activists and Planned Parenthood of Connecticut. A supporter of the convention questions, Rep. Rowe said he would like to protect homeowners from eminent-domain abuses, push for binding-arbitration reform and ethics reform. Rowe also supports a proposal to limit marriage to heterosexual couples, but he noted that a challenge to the state's civil-union law is pending before the state Supreme Court.
Comments
Excellent web page. I like your writing comments system. My apologies for the off-topic posting, but I was really amazed with Djokovic’s play in the final of the Australian OPen this year. The guy is definitely unequalled. He demonstrated he had been as solid as stainless steel. Only imagine about he he could overcome Nadal who had previously been so inspired to succeed and really was so energized up during the fifth set. I am beginning to consider that Djokovic has been doing some faith based work to bring some forces on his side which help him secure these kinds of matches against the finest players in the planet
buy a good essay. Whatrrrs your opinion in relation to Rafa’s game?
