Flawed initiative: Obvious legal problems should sink ‘personhood’ proposal
Related News
- 01/22/10 — Deadline For Colo. “Personhood” Amendment Moved Up
- 01/14/10 — Group: Enough signatures for parental notification measure
- 01/11/10 — Nevada Court Rejects ‘Personhood’ Ballot Measure
- 01/08/10 — Judge: ‘Personhood’ abortion petition too general for November ballot
- 12/03/09 — Jan. hearing set on Nev. personhood initiative
- More Reproductive Freedom news
Anchorage Daily News: Should a single-celled embryo or a fetus incapable of life outside the womb have the legal rights of a "person" in Alaska? The answer will be yes if a proposed ballot initiative survives legal challenge, gains sufficient signatures and is approved by a majority of Alaska voters. Let's hope it doesn't come to that.
Passing the so-called "personhood" initiative would essentially assert state control over the bodies of pregnant women. Consider just a few of the bizarre questions that could arise if such an initiative were to pass. Would a rapist have the legal right to hire a lawyer to represent the embryo inside his victim, to ensure that the child is born? What potential lawsuit awaits the woman who smokes a cigarette or drinks alcohol during her pregnancy? Would the federal census count a woman pregnant with twins as three people? Would fertility clinics that store embryos for implantation be subject to regulation as orphanages? So what would justify the creation of such a legal quagmire?
The initiative sponsor, Christopher Kurka, freely admits that "personhood" is an effort to stop legal abortion. His is a futile quest because abortion, with some limitations, is a constitutional right in the United States, and a state-level voter initiative can't override the U.S. Constitution. For that reason alone, Alaska courts would be justified in stopping the initiative. This legal problem was so obvious, even the staunchly anti-abortion Parnell administration couldn't overlook it. Attorney General Dan Sullivan suggested, and Lt. Gov. Craig Campbell agreed, to try to rescue the initiative by including language saying it wouldn't affect state law on abortion, even though that's why it exists.
To read more, click here.
Comments
Outstanding post. The graphic content shown right here is actually of quite high quality. I’m going to take advantage of this internet site much more frequently pertaining to
report an ip address
